Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ghostbusters (2016)
#1
Oops.

I pit stopped in Vegas at the South Point hotel. Low and behold there was a cinemark cinema in the hotel, just an escalator ride away from the smoke filled Casino floor. I was sorely tempted by the fact that they were doing Thursday night screenings of Suicide Squad. But wanting to maintain marital harmony, I opted for Ghostbusters. Yes, I could have also seen the new Star Trek, but Ghostbusters fit better into my schedule. Oh, the mistakes that are made due to convenience.

Ghostbusters 2016 is bad. No two ways about it. What the fanboys who hated on the movie when it was originally announced should have done was waited until it came out before shredding it. Rather than shredding it before they had seen it. If they had opted for the first option, they would have been justified in their hatred. By pursuing the latter course, they just came across as mysogynistic loons.

But back to the badness. In the first scene, a guys seems to die by falling into some dark depths. The next time we see the guy, he is alive and talking and no explanation is given as to how he escaped. He was just back talking to the Ghostbusters. He did mention he was so scared he pooped himself, but no explanation of how he is still walking around. Pooping himself was the level of the humor for the picture.

It seems the whole movie was just an excuse to throw back to the original Ghostbuster. They had cameos from the extant survivors but they weren't very good. They showed some of the original sets to no effect. They teased with snippets of the original soundtrack but the new tracks paled in comparison.

At the end, the whole exercise seemed kind of pointless. They never brought their own original take on the story. The McKinnon character, the blond actress who everyone raves about, just seemed to be arch for no apparent reason.

There was no learning curve in the movie either. All of a sudden they just had the tools to snare the ghosts but no explanation of how they actually worked. And there was never any trapping of the ghosts, they were just destroyed. It was a muddle.

Chris Hemsworth was funny but it was a one note kind of funny. He plays Kevin and Kevin is dumb. What else you got for me?

Yes, it is hard to live up to the brilliance of the original film but this film didn't even come close. The story was bad. The jokes weren't funny except for one. The effects seemed derivative. The best thing about the film was the closing credits and the tease in it. If I had anything to do, I would have left while they rolled.
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply
#2
We got most of the way through this just now.  It is as bad as Greg said.  The SNL gals almost make it happen but the miss makes it worse.  Stacy fell asleep but I didn't notice.  Then she woke up and asked if it was still going just before the finale.  I'll probably finish it just because I'm so close (and Greg has my interest piqued with the end credit thing).  But yeah.  Bad.  Such a disappointment.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#3
Finished it.  Even got to that end of credit scene just because Greg mentioned it.  Debating if that was worth it.  This proves that a reboot cannot make it on easter eggs alone.  There were glimmers of potential, but it all seemed so thrown together, such a waste of a great cast.  And Chris was not funny.  That's where Greg was mistaken, surely a reflection of his MCU mancrush with Thor (can't blame him for that tho - Thor is pretty hunky). I'm mildy curious at what the one joke was that Greg thought was funny, but I suspect he doesn't remember.  If he does, that's a waste of a neuron.  

We'll see how the next reboot goes.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#4
Yawn.

But I'll see it.
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply
#5
You're a glutton for ghostbusters.

I dunno.  The concept is intriguing but so was the concept for this.  Maybe I'll let you jump on that grenade and then chime in years later again.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#6
This is going to come as a surprise, but I kind of enjoyed Afterlife.

The film centers on Phoebe as her family is uprooted from New York and moves to Summerville, Oklahoma after her single mother gets evicted. They move into the spooky home their grandfather bequeathed to them. Strange things start to occur. It's up to Phoebe and her older brother Trevor and there new friends in Summerville to stop it. The best relationship in the film is between Phoebe and Podcast, another outsider who spends the majority of the time recording a podcast on his gear.

There are funny bits, but not laugh out loud like the OG Ghostbusters. There some adventure stuff. It's more like Goonies than it is an Adult Ghostbusters. I think the ending was a bit heavy handed and kind of work but I gave it a pass because I enjoyed the film so much up until that point. Stay through the credits.
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply
#7
(11-21-2021, 08:22 AM)Greg Wrote: Stay through the credits.

I fell for that last time.

Dammit. I'll probably fall for it again. #thanskgreg
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#8
I forgot the most important thing about Ghostbusters: Afterlife. Nilo Otero worked on it.
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply
#9
Ghostbusters: Afterlife was a bit of alright. 

It was a clever reboot of the franchise, propelling into this generation with a reincarnated spirit that was both heartfelt and fresh. Yes, packed with Easter eggs but well laid ones. Cameos from the original cast led to a predictable ending. The kids were good. Rudd was even good and I’m not a fan at all. 

The ‘for Harold’ gave me the feels. Such a franchise rebound after the previous reboot flop.

Yesterday was Ghostbusters day and Reitman announced the sequel to this that was teased at the end-of-credits scene has the working title Firehouse. I’m in.

D00M recommended if you enjoyed the original film (and who didn’t?)
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#10
Caught this again on DirecTV's free premium weekend. Still fun. Still sat through the credits. I wonder if they are going to do another given that end scene,
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply
#11
(06-09-2022, 09:08 PM)Drunk Monk Wrote: Yesterday was Ghostbusters day and Reitman announced the sequel to this that was teased at the end-of-credits scene has the working title Firehouse. 
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#12
Asked and answered. Thank you.
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply
#13
Answered 5 1/2 month before the question was asked. 

FTW

You know, I posted some winning lotto numbers up there too somewhere...
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#14
(01-29-2024, 04:19 PM)Greg Wrote: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire


Watched on the flight between Taipei and SFO.

It was alright, a fair continuation of the next gen ghostbusters despite too much Paul Rudd (even a little Rudd is too much for me). Like the previous, it gets good when it throws back to the original Ghostbusters. Grace McKenna (Phoebe Spengler) has a stand out newcomer performance. Kumail Najiani has a good role that works for him at the start, but then strays and evaporates where it could've double downed and been funnier. Lots more Easter eggs, lots of plot holes like what is up with the mini-StayPuft ghosts? Lawd, I sound like Greg with that dumb question. But entertaining if not taken too seriously. I liked the Melody storyline, which I should've predicted but wasn't paying that much attention - she was played by Emily Alyn Lind who was the child version of Amanda in Revenge

Only recommended for Greg because he seems to be the only D00Mer that cares about Ghostbusters anymore, and that recommendation is just to hear more dumb questions.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#15
Waiting for it to be free. And even then, not that interested.
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)