12-09-2018, 11:34 AM
3-http://www.brotherhoodofdoom.com/doomForum/showthread.php?tid=378
4-http://www.brotherhoodofdoom.com/doomForum/showthread.php?tid=2522
Now 5. This is 5, right? I've lost count.
Same thing happened. After watching IM5, I was like 'wth happened in IM4?' There were references to it with Ethan's past women who look too much alike for me to distinguish all the time, adding to the confusion. Renner is out. Nobody misses him when he's off the IM or the Avengers. He's so negligible. Pegg is in. If you want to make any franchise reboot entertaining, add Pegg. Rhames is in too and I've decided he's the bastard child of the original IMF's Barney and Willy.
This is more of the same - enjoyable with panoramic action pieces (kinda wished I saw it on the big screen). Tom does some cool stunts - hard to say where the CGI begins but there's some stuff that's clearly Tom like the high altitude jumps. He's another vampire - doesn't freakin age. Pegg adds levity. Could've used more of him. Rhames is oddly dramatic, which doesn't quite work. The bathroom fight is pretty tight choreographically. Great Wolf cameo. All of the dream sequences and mask ruses were predictable. I loved the Paris scenes because I could say 'We were right there! right where Tom is standing!' In a chase scene, they went right past our fav crepe place and magically ended up on the Champ de Elysees in the next scene, kinda like how SF dimensionally folds from the Golden Gate to Chinatown with one turn in movies.
Bottom line - if you enjoy this franchise, you'll enjoy this too. It's mindless fluff but spectacular. And Tom is still cool in that insufferable way that's so him.
4-http://www.brotherhoodofdoom.com/doomForum/showthread.php?tid=2522
Now 5. This is 5, right? I've lost count.
(09-21-2012, 02:29 PM)Drunk Monk Wrote: After watching IM4, I was like 'wtf happened in IM3?' Fortunately I reviewed it here so I could check my DOOMemory banks. IM1 I remember because it was Depalma and they totally mucked up Phelps. MI2 had that absurd motorcycle duel and it was John Woo. IM3 was J.J. Abrams, which I knew, but forgot I knew. I also forget Maggie Q was in it.
Same thing happened. After watching IM5, I was like 'wth happened in IM4?' There were references to it with Ethan's past women who look too much alike for me to distinguish all the time, adding to the confusion. Renner is out. Nobody misses him when he's off the IM or the Avengers. He's so negligible. Pegg is in. If you want to make any franchise reboot entertaining, add Pegg. Rhames is in too and I've decided he's the bastard child of the original IMF's Barney and Willy.
This is more of the same - enjoyable with panoramic action pieces (kinda wished I saw it on the big screen). Tom does some cool stunts - hard to say where the CGI begins but there's some stuff that's clearly Tom like the high altitude jumps. He's another vampire - doesn't freakin age. Pegg adds levity. Could've used more of him. Rhames is oddly dramatic, which doesn't quite work. The bathroom fight is pretty tight choreographically. Great Wolf cameo. All of the dream sequences and mask ruses were predictable. I loved the Paris scenes because I could say 'We were right there! right where Tom is standing!' In a chase scene, they went right past our fav crepe place and magically ended up on the Champ de Elysees in the next scene, kinda like how SF dimensionally folds from the Golden Gate to Chinatown with one turn in movies.
Bottom line - if you enjoy this franchise, you'll enjoy this too. It's mindless fluff but spectacular. And Tom is still cool in that insufferable way that's so him.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse

