Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Long Day's Journey into Night (2018) by Bi Gan
#1
I've been waiting to get a gawk at this one, and it's short, only 2 hours and 20 minutes.  But a third of the way in I'm so lost that I pause the movie and go check IMDB, just for it's capsule description (and also to beat Halvah with a newspaper while she peekaboos out of the carpeted tunnels I built for her).  As it turns out, I'm mostly aboard with understanding things.

So I resume, and I get to a point where the protagonist sits down in a dark trashy movie theater, and he notes someone else in the audience putting on 3D glasses, so he puts on a pair too, then props his head against the wall next to him.  Then it's fade to black, after which we get the title card with music, and I'm thinking, Is this the end?  So I pause the movie and see that I'm pretty much at the midpoint, so I keep watching, and the protagonist is now in a cave system of tunnels, and as it turns out, he fell asleep in the theater, woke with everything pitch-black, and he stumbled about and down this passage to find find himself in this cave system.

So, what the fuck?  I watched the rest of the movie.  I mean, I'm not going to piecemeal a movie with a mere 2 hours and 20 minutes running time.  Enough of that shit.  And afterwards I read up some more on what I've watched.

Long Day's Journey into Night was promoted as a love story and drew large crowds on opening night.  It made for a big box office.  The next night the attendance dropped by 97% due to word of mouth.  Because what the studio and ads hadn't made clear was that this is an art-house film.  And by art-house I mean largely impenetrable.  Which is not to say it's bad.  It's brilliant in its own way.  Very dreamlike.  And I liked it a lot.  But it's a hard slog for a general audience.  Still, it's now regarded as China's greatest art-house film -- with the emphasis on art-house.

Oh, and it has an hour-long shot, which I didn't notice.  Am I really that dense?  It's something Bi Gan is known for.  Previously he'd done it in Kaili Blues.  Of course, he wanted to outdo himself this time.  As it turns out, after the protagonist falls asleep in the movie theater, all that follows is a single shot, which involves all kind of activities, from a ping pong match, game of billiards, riding down a zip line, eating a whole apple (twice!), and all sorts of events involving an assortment of people, and crowds.  It's mesmerizing.  Bi Gan did 7 takes before he got what he wanted.

Oh, one more thing.  When the protagonist puts on the 3D glasses at the mid-point of the movie?  That's when the audience is supposed to don theirs.  Because that hour-long shot that makes up the last half of the movie is in 3D.  Yes, he shot it all using bulky 3D camera equipment.

Recommended for people exactly like me -- though I suppose that leaves out a lot of people.
Reply
#2
A 3D hour long one-er?  Wow.  

Which reminds me - why haven't any of us seen 1917 yet?

Huh
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#3
I'd have to leave the house.
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply
#4
(02-07-2020, 09:12 PM)Greg Wrote: I'd have to leave the house.

fair

[Image: tenor.gif?itemid=4994529]
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#5
(02-07-2020, 08:27 PM)Drunk Monk Wrote: A 3D hour long one-er?  Wow.  

Which reminds me - why haven't any of us seen 1917 yet?
I lost enthusiasm for 1917 based on a youtube review by yourmoviesucks.  Yourmoviesucks presents himself as a real jerk, but then you start listening and realize he's very balanced and well-reasoned.  And he doesn't proclaim everything in sight sucks.  He praises as much as he criticizes.  Anyway, he convinced me that 1917 is deficient in ways that would matter to me.  The Academy of course would beg to differ with their nomination, but fuck the Academy.

If you're interested, here's the review:


Oh, and his take on this year's Academy nominations, and what he feels was overlooked.

Reply
#6
who heeds a critic plagiarist?

[Image: 41o0RKKIRuL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg]
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#7
Wow.  That's, uh, FTW, I believe.

Humbled but unapologetic...
Reply
#8
I got lucky.  I watched Life Itself last night (http://www.brotherhoodofdoom.com/doomFor...p?tid=3466) and they showed all of Roger's old book covers.  He was quite prolific, even wrote a book about London Garden walks.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)