Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Love Hurts
#1


From the makers of:
Violent Night = http://www.brotherhoodofdoom.com/doomFor...p?tid=7824
Nobody = http://www.brotherhoodofdoom.com/doomFor...p?tid=6380

It's another 87 North production, so that means fight scenes. And after Violent Night, it's clear that 87 North is campaigning to capitalize on every holiday. I'm ok with that. This is more of the same. Ultravi. 

Ke carries action ok. He has trained. He can move. And he has body doubles for the tough stuff. I suspect this might tarnish his momentum somewhat. 

My main reason to see this in the theaters was Daniel Wu, of course, and he hams it up as the villainous brother. That was amusing - too 2D for his talents - but he's always drinking boba and that struck me as acute, if overdone. He wasn't choreographed well, but that was in part due to the fact that he ultimately has to lose to Ke and Ke doesn't have Danny's fight skills. 

The fight choreo has its moments. It's mostly one action = one shot stuff. There are several dynamic birdseye shots of a whirling Ke stuntdouble with an unconvincing wig and tighter build taking out a circle of surrounding thugs. There are some amusing fight gags but nothing astonishingly new here. If anything, it's more of the same and the trailer spoils way too much, even though it was all rather predictable. Nevertheless, it's destined to become my fav valentines movie. 

Not overly D00M recommended. Wait until it comes to platform you can stream.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#2
An enjoyable bit of ultri-vi fluff. Def a good Valentine’s movie. Not in the same league as “Violent Night”, though. That movie had great fights and an actual layered story.
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply
#3
Good valentine's flick for your partner, not mine. But agreed on all points.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#4
(05-06-2025, 10:45 PM)Drunk Monk Wrote: Good valentine's flick for your partner, not mine. But agreed on all points.

Not mine, either. The Ultra-Vi hits her viscerally and really sticks with her, so she chooses not to participate.
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply
#5
Hmm.

Then a good valentines flick for who exactly?
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#6
(05-06-2025, 11:10 PM)Drunk Monk Wrote: Hmm.

Then a good valentines flick for who exactly?

For you two!

--tg
Reply
#7
[Blushing]
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: